FORMATION OF MICROBIAL BIOFILMS IN CAUSATIVE AGENTS OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC PYELONEPHRITIS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. Study the intensity of formation of microbial biofilms by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated during various forms of pyelonephritis. Materials and methods. 150 clinical isolates of microorganisms isolated from urine of patients with acute and chronic pyelonephritis were included into the study. Determination of intensity of film-formation was carried out by staining of the formed biofilms by crystal violet with consequent extraction of the dye and measurement of its concentration in washout solution. Results. Among causative agents of pyelonephritis P. aeruginosa isolates had the maximum film-forming ability. The intensity of biofilm formation of these isolates was 2-3 time higher than staphylococcus and enterobacteria strains. Strains isolated from patients with chronic pyelonephritis by ability to form biofilms significantly surpassed strains isolated from acute pyelonephritis patients. A higher ability to form microbial biofilms for microorganisms - causative agents of pyelonephritis progressing against the background of urolithiasis was noted. Conclusion. The ability to form biofilms is determined by both causative agent species and character of the infectious process in which this microorganism participates. Intensive formation of biofilms by E. coli, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, S. aureus clinical isolates may be an important factor of chronization of urinary tract infections.

About the authors

L. V Lagun

Gomel State Medical University, Republic of Belarus

Yu. V Atanasova

Gomel State Medical University, Republic of Belarus

D. V Tapalsky

Gomel State Medical University, Republic of Belarus

References

  1. Романова Ю.М., Гинцбург А.Л. Бактериальные биопленки как естественная форма существования бактерий в окружающей среде и в организме хозяина. Журн. микро-биол. 2011, 3: 99-109.
  2. Саркулова М.Н. Характер и этиологическая структура внутрибольничной инфекции у урологических больных. Урология. 2006, 1: 19-22.
  3. Choong S., Whitfield H. Biofilms and their role in infections in urology. BJU International. 2000, 86: 935-941.
  4. Lewis K. Riddle of biofilm resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45 (4): 9991007.
  5. Tenke P., Koves B., Nagy K. et al. Update on biofilm infections in the urinary tract. World J. Urol. 2012, 30: 51-57.
  6. Tenke P., Koves B., Jackel M. et al. The role ofbiofilm infection in urology. World J. Urol. 2006, 24: 13-20.
  7. Wathick P., Kolter R. Biofilm, city of microbes. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182: 2675-2679.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2013 Lagun L.V., Atanasova Y.V., Tapalsky D.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ПИ № ФС77-75442 от 01.04.2019 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies