Spectrum and functional properties of ERG11 gene mutations in fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans strains isolated from HIV-infected patients

Cover Page


Cite item

Abstract

Rationale. The low efficacy of azole antimycotics in treatment of Candida infections, especially in HIV-infected patients, is often associated with overexpression of the ERG11 gene in Candida spp., which results in increased production of ergosterol – the target of the above antimycotic drugs. Researchers have found ERG11 gene mutations that can modify its overexpression effects by increasing or decreasing it. However, the findings reported by different laboratories and countries are highly contradictory.

The purpose of the study is to explore the spectrum and functional properties of ERG11 gene mutations in fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans strains isolated from HIV-infected patients.

Materials and methods. The study was performed using 10 C. albicans strains inherently resistant to fluconazole and voriconazole and isolated from the oropharynx of HIV-infected patients; the strains were provided from the collection of the Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology. The strains were assessed by their sensitivity to antimycotic agents: anidulafungin, micafungin, caspofungin, posaconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine. Expression levels of the ERG11 gene were measured by quantitative PCR. ERG11 gene mutations were identified by Sanger sequencing.

Results. Five mutations (E266D, G464S, I471L, D116E, and V488I) were detected in the ERG11 gene in seven C. albicans strains; six strains carried non-associated co-occurring mutations. Increased expression of the ERG11 gene was found in six C. albicans strains. The V488I mutation demonstrated a strong negative association with the increased expression of the ERG11 gene (r = –0.845; p < 0.05). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in strains carrying mutations was a hundred times as low (p < 0.05) as MIC in strains without mutations. In mutation carriers, posaconazole and itraconazole MICs were on average 16.5 times as low as MICs of voriconazole and fluconazole (p < 0.001). The presence of mutations in the ERG11 gene had almost no effect on MICs of the tested antimycotics of the echinocandin, polyene, and pyrimidine groups.

Conclusion. Multiple mutations were detected in the ERG11 gene in most of the C. albicans strains isolated from HIV-infected patients and resistant to fluconazole and voriconazole. Except for the V488I mutation, the detected mutations were not associated with the overexpression of the ERG11 gene and decreased the effects of overexpression of the ERG11 gene by up to 100 times, though they did not eliminate the inherent resistance to triazole antimycotics.

Full Text

Introduction

The widespread use of fluconazole in the prevention and treatment of Candida infection, especially among immunocompromised individuals, promoted the resistance to azole antimycotics among fungi of the genus Candida [1, 2]. Candida spp. frequently display overexpression of genes encoding the synthesis of the antimycotic drug target. An important role belongs to the ERG11 gene encoding lanosterol 14-α-demethylase. This enzyme participates in the final step of the synthesis of ergosterol – an integral part of the fungal cell membrane and the target of azole antimycotics. Overexpression of the ERG11 gene results in elevated ergosterol synthesis, thus decreasing the Candida species sensitivity to therapeutic dosages of antimycotics [3]. At the same time, fluconazole can promote the development of the mechanism of microbial drug resistance [4], which, in its turn, is especially high against short-chain azoles like fluconazole [5].

A number of mutations detected in the ERG11 gene can modify the effects of its overexpression to a certain extent. They were associated both with an increase and with a decrease in resistance to azoles [6–10]. However, the findings reported by different laboratories and countries are highly contradictory.

The purpose of the study is to explore the spectrum and functional properties of ERG11 gene mutations in fluconazole-resistant C. albicans strains isolated from HIV-infected patients.

Materials and methods

The study was performed using 10 C. albicans strains inherently resistant to fluconazole and voriconazole from the collection of the Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology of Rospotrebnadzor.

C. albicans strains were assessed by:

  • the level of expression and the presence of mutations in the ERG11 gene encoding lanosterol 14-α-demethylase;
  • sensitivity to a number of antimycotic drugs belonging to triazole, echinocandin, polyene, and pyrimidine groups.

The C. albicans strains were isolated from the oropharynx of HIV-infected patients aged 20–69 years, having clinical manifestations of oropharyngeal candidiasis and undergoing treatment in Infectious Disease Clinical Hospital No. 2 in Moscow. HIV infection in all the patients was diagnosed using clinical and epidemiological data and confirmed by the detection of specific antibodies/antigens using enzyme immunoassay and lysate-based immunoblot assay for antibodies against human immunodeficiency virus proteins (Profiblot 48 TECAN, AutoBlot 3000) in accordance with the clinical classification of HIV infection1. All the participating patients signed their informed consent allowing the use of the laboratory test data for scientific purposes. All studies were carried out with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the South Ural State Medical University (minutes No. 4, 25/4/2014) in accordance with the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki adopted by the World Medical Association in 1964 and outlining the ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Identification of C. albicans species was performed using different methods:

  1. Approximate differentiation of fungi by colony color after incubation on specific chromogenic media (Oxoid, HiMedia) at 37ºC for 24–48 hours in accordance with the manufacturer’s instruction;
  2. Assessment of biochemical activity following the incubation of standardized cell suspensions in the wells of plates of the Remel RapID YEAST PLUS and ErbaLachema commercial biochemical test systems at 37ºC in accordance with the manufacturer’s instruction. The results were measured visually or semi-automatically in each well and interpreted in accordance with the manufacturer's instruction or using the respective software.
  3. Real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) using the AmpliSens C.albicans/ C. glabrata/C. krusei — MULTIPRIME-FL reagent kit for simultaneous hybridization-fluorescence detection of C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. krusei DNA. DNA was extracted from Candida spp. pure cultures using DNA-sorb-AM reagent kits (Central Research Institute of Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor) in accordance with the manufacturer's instruction. The Applied Biosystems 7500 Real Time PCR System was used for amplification.

The sensitivity to echinocandins (anidulafungin, micafungin, caspofungin), azoles (posaconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole), amphotericin B, and 5-flucytosine was evaluated. The analysis was performed in accordance with the recommendations issued by the Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy for testing sensitivity of microorganisms to antimicrobial agents with reference to CLSI M44 and M60 standards for Candida spp. as well as standards and criteria of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for the microdilution method and bacterial cultures2.

The minimum inhibitory concentration of the agent (MIC; mg/ml) was measured by serial microdilutions using Sensititre YeastOne10 plates (Trek Diagnostic System) in accordance with the manufacturer's instruction. The inoculum was prepared in the similar way as for the

disk diffusion method, then it was placed into the modified RPMI-1640 medium and distributed into 96-well plates containing serial microdilutions of antimycotic substances [11]. The results were measured visually by comparing with the growth in the positive control well in accordance with the criteria of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [12].

Levels of ERG11 gene expression were measured by quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method [13]. RNA was extracted from a pure daily culture of the studied strain using the ExtractRNA reagent (Evrogen) in accordance with the manufacturer's instruction. The reverse transcription was carried out using the Reverta-L kit (Central Research Institute of Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor) in accordance with the manufacturer's instruction: 30 min at 37ºC. The following primers were used for PCR:

ERG11:

  • F — aactacttttgtttataatttaagatggactattga;
  • R — aatgatttctgctggttcagtaggt;

PMA1:

  • F — ttgaagatgaccacccaatcc;
  • R — gaaacctctggaagcaaattgg;

ACT1:

  • F — ttggtgatgaagcccaatcc;
  • R — catatcgtcccagttggaaaca.

The amplification was performed using the reagent kit for real-time PCR in the presence of Sybr-Green I intercalating dyes (Syntol) and the Applied Biosystems 7500 Real Time PCR System in accordance with the following parameters: 95ºC, 3 min; 40 cycles at 95ºC, 10 sec, 55ºC, 20 sec.

The ACT and PMA housekeeping genes were used as control genes. The reference 2ΔΔCT values for the ERG11 gene were obtained by analyzing sensitive isolates (n = 7). The expression level of the studied strain was considered significantly increased, if it was higher than the reference mean values for sensitive isolates (m) by more than 3 standard deviations (3σ).

For Sanger sequencing of the ERG11 gene [14], the following primers were used:

ERG11-1:

  • F — atggctattgttgaaactgtcatt;
  • R — ggatcaatatcaccacgttctc;

ERG11-2:

  • F — attggagacgtgatgctgctcaa;
  • R — ccaaatgatttctgctggttcagt.

The ERG11 gene was amplified for sequencing using the Qiagen PCR Master Mix, 2x reagent kit and the Applied Biosystems Veriti thermal cycler in accordance with the protocol: 95ºC for 15 min; 35 cycles at 95ºC for 40 sec, 60ºC for 40 sec, 72ºC for 1.5 min; then at 72ºC for 10 min. The PCR products were purified using the ExoSAP-IT kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) in accordance with the manufacturer's instruction. The sequencing reaction was performed with the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) and the following parameters: 95ºC for 15 min, 35 cycles at 95ºC for 15 sec, 55ºC for 15 sec, 72ºC for 30 sec; 72ºC for 7 min. The products were further purified using the BigDye Xterminator Purification Kit (Applied Biosystems); the Applied Biosystems 3500 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems) was used for sequencing.

Microsoft Excel, SciPy [15], Matplotlib [16] software was used for the statistical analysis and data visualization. The significance of differences between groups was assessed using Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. The significance level for the statistical hypothesis test was set at p < 0.05, the value universally practiced in medical research. The strength of relationships between variables was measured using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results

The study showed that 7 (70%) C. albicans strains had 5 mutations in the ERG11 gene, which were identified as E266D, G464S, I471L, D116E, and V488I. The highest frequency of occurrence was demonstrated by the E266D mutation, while the I471L mutation was detected most rarely (Table 1). The total number of mutations was 13.

 

Table 1. Mutations identified in the ERG11 gene

Mutation

Abs.

%

E266D

4

40

G464S

2

20

I471L

1

10

D116E

3

30

V488I

3

30

 

Compound, two-component mutations were carried by 6 (92.3%) strains (Table 2). The highest tendency toward forming compound mutations was demonstrated by E266D and V488I – 3 (30%) mutations in each. No noticeable association between mutations was observed — the correlation coefficient was 0.410 or lower.

 

Table 2. Associations of mutations identified in the ERG11 gene

Mutation

Abs.

%

Аssociation coefficient

E266D + G464S

1

10

0,100

E266D + D116E

2

20

0,356

E266D + V488I

1

10

0,089

V488I + I471L

1

10

0,409

V488I + D116E

1

10

0,045

 

Overexpression of the ERG11 gene was detected in 60% of the tested C. albicans strains. The detected mutations occurred much more frequently in strains with overexpression of the above gene (Table 3). In the meantime, the statistical analysis did not reveal any significant associations between them. At the same time, the V488I mutation demonstrated a strong negative relationship with the overexpression of the ERG11 gene (r = –0.845; p < 0.05).

 

Table 3. Association of mutations in the ERG11 gene with its hyperexpression

Mutation

Strains with overexpression of the gene

Strains without overexpression of the gene

Аssociation coefficient

abs.

%

abs.

%

E266D

3

75,0

1

25,0

0,251

G464S

1

50,0

1

50,0

0,457

I471L

1

100,0

0

0,0

D116E

2

66,7

1

33,3

0,094

V488I

1

33,3

2

66,7

–0,845

The sum

8

61,5

5

38,5

0,089

Combined

4

66,7

2

33,3

0,251

 

The results of the analysis of the association between the mutations and the sensitivity to antimycotic agents are presented in Table 4, showing that MIC in strains carrying some mutation was approximately equal to or significantly lower than MIC in strains without mutations. The noticeably significant difference was demonstrated by the sensitivity to azole antimycotics, MIC of which was 100 times lower in mutation carriers (p < 0.05) compared to the strains without mutations.

 

Table 4. Relationship of mutations in the ERG11 gene with the sensitivity of C. albicans to antimycotic drugs

Mutation

n

Anidulafungin

Micafungin

Caspofungin

Posaconasole

Voriconasole

Itraconazole

Fluconazole

Amphotericin В

5-Flucitosine

The sum

+

12

0,03 ± 0,003

0,012 ± 0,001

0,08 ± 0,009

0,043 ± 0,019

1,083 ± 0,393

0,082 ± 0,038

33,333 ± 10,130

0,708 ± 0,074

0,065 ± 0,005

28

0,041 ± 0,003

0,013 ± 0,001

0,086 ± 0,006

3,471 ± 1,117

4,036 ± 1,067

6,941 ± 2,234

98,857 ± 20,285

0,768 ± 0,048

0,066 ± 0,004

E266D

+

4

0,026 ± 0,004

0,012 ± 0,002

0,075 ± 0,015

0,023 ± 0,004

1,375 ± 0,875

0,038 ± 0,008

28,00 ± 12,000

0,75 ± 0,144

0,06 ± 0,000

6

0,045 ± 0,007

0,013 ± 0,001

0,09 ± 0,013

4,057 ± 2,716

4,333 ± 2,635

8,113 ± 5,432

113,333 ± 48,637

0,75 ± 0,112

0,07 ± 0,010

G464S

+

2

0,045 ± 0,015

0,012 ± 0,004

0,12 ± 0,000

0,133 ± 0,118

2,25 ± 1,750

0,265 ± 0,235

96,00 ± 32,000

1,00 ± 0,000

0,06 ± 0,000

8

0,036 ± 0,006

0,012 ± 0,001

0,075 ± 0,010

3,021 ± 2,100

3,375 ± 2,028

6,038 ± 4,201

75,00 ± 39,509

0,688 ± 0,091

0,068 ± 0,007

D116E

+

3

0,025 ± 0,005

0,01 ± 0,002

0,06 ± 0,000

0,03 ± 0,000

0,50 ± 0,000

0,05 ± 0,010

16,00 ± 0,000

0,667 ± 0,167

0,06 ± 0,000

7

0,043 ± 0,006

0,013 ± 0,001

0,094 ± 0,012

3,477 ± 2,368

4,286 ± 2,228

6,954 ± 4,735

106,286 ± 41,705

0,786 ± 0,101

0,069 ± 0,009

V488I

+

3

0,03 ± 0,000

0,013 ± 0,002

0,08 ± 0,020

0,025 ± 0,005

0,50 ± 0,000

0,05 ± 0,010

16,00 ± 0,000

0,50 ± 0,000

0,08 ± 0,020

7

0,041 ± 0,007

0,012 ± 0,001

0,086 ± 0,012

3,479 ± 2,367

4,286 ± 2,228

6,954 ± 4,735

106,286 ± 41,705

0,857 ± 0,092

0,06 ± 0,000

Note. "+" — mutation is present, "–" — mutation is absent.

 

Among triazoles, significant differences were demonstrated by posaconazole and itraconazole, MIC of which in mutation carriers was 100 times as low (p < 0.05) as MIC in strains without mutations in the ERG11 gene. Furthermore, MIC of these agents was on average 16.5 times as low as MIC of voriconazole and fluconazole (p < 0.001). Among the detected mutations, the G464S mutation deserves close attention: In its carriers, MIC of triazoles decreased less significantly than with other mutations (p < 0.05). The correlation analysis did not reveal any relationship between the chemical structure and molecular weight of the triazole agent and the presence of mutations.

The presence of mutations in the ERG11 gene did not have any significant effect on MICs of the tested echinocandins, amphotericin B, and 5-flucytosine. However, in carriers of the G464S mutation, MICs of anidulafungin, caspofungin, and amphotericin B tended to shift insignificantly towards resistance (p > 0.05).

Discussion

During our molecular and genetic study of C. albicans strains that were inherently resistant to fluconazole and voriconazole, we detected high occurrence of overexpression of the ERG11 gene as well as a number of mutations in the above gene: D116E, E266D, G464S, I471L, and V488I. The E266D mutation was most frequently detected in our subset of C. albicans. The above mutations were described previously; however, they are not ubiquitous [17–26]. Since all strains were viable, we concluded that the location of these mutations did not affect critical regions of the genome, and they were not lethal.

Hypothetically, the gene overexpression must create favorable conditions for mutation or recombination process. However, as our findings show, the mutations in the ERG11 gene are not associated with its overexpression. Moreover, in most cases, the overexpression of the gene and its V488I mutation occurred discordantly. We can assume that the occurrence of the V488I mutation disables the ability of the gene to multiply.

One of the characteristics of the detected mutations was their co-occurrence. The co-occurrence of E266D and G464S mutations was previously described by researchers from China, the Unites States, and some other countries [7, 20, 25, 27–30]. In the meantime, based on the low likelihood of the linkage between individual mutations, the above co-occurrence should be seen as a random event. It means that, most likely, mutations are not linked with each other, i.e. they emerge independently in various regions of the gene, and their location does not depend on anything.

The continuous use of azole agents in treatment of HIV-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis puts strong pressure on the C. albicans population, which starts accumulating resistant strains, including strains with overexpression of the ERG11 gene. Functionally, this mechanism promotes the synthesis of the azole target. At the same time, nonsynonymous mutations in the ERG11 gene lead to modification of the target molecule and, consequently, to altered affinity of antifungal agents to their target [21]. As a result, the effects of gene overexpression are reduced. This phenomenon was pointed out when strains with mutations D116E, G464S, and E266D were studied [5–7, 9, 10, 17, 22, 24, 31–36]; these mutations were found to be associated with a manifold increase in MIC of azole agents. At the same time, the V488I mutation as well as E266D and D116E, as demonstrated by some studied, remained neutral and had no effect on MIC [4–6, 9, 32, 37]. It is believed that this mechanism may remain idle if overexpression of the ERG11 gene is absent [20].

Compared to studies of other researchers cited above, all the mutations detected in our study were associated with increased sensitivity to triazole agents unlike the strains without mutations, though the tested C. albicans strains were resistant. Only the G464S mutation was slightly slow in manifestation of these properties. It can be assumed that the detected mutations significantly affected the structure of the site of interaction between the target molecule and triazoles, which reduced their affinity. At the same time, we did not find any association between MIC in mutant strains and the chemical structure of the therapeutic agent, though overexpression of the ERG11 gene was more efficient against short-chain azoles [3]. The detected mutations had no effect on the sensitivity of the tested strains to echinocandins, amphotericin B, and 5-flucytosine.

In our study, mutant C. albicans strains showed higher sensitivity to itraconazole and posaconazole than to voriconazole and fluconazole. This difference may be associated with the rare administration of the first two drugs for treatment of HIV-infected patients and with the targeted selection of strains by their resistance to the last two drugs.

Thus, most of the studied C. albicans strains, which are resistant to fluconazole and voriconazole, had mutations in the ERG11 gene: D116E, E266D, G464S, I471L, and V488I, which, except for the V488I mutation, are not associated with the overexpression of the above gene. The detected mutations decreased the effects of ERG11 gene overexpression up to 100 times, though they did not eliminate the inherent resistance to triazole antimycotics and did not affect the sensitivity to echinocandins, amphotericin B, and 5-flucytosine.

It should be remembered that the studied strains were isolated from HIV-infected patients – permanent residents of Moscow. Therefore, the obtained results should be interpreted taking into account the specific features of the Moscow Region. The absence of any firm conclusion about the effects of ERG11 gene mutations necessitates further research, including clinical studies.

Conclusions

  1. D116E, E266D, G464S, I471L, and V488I mutations are detected in the ERG11 gene in C. albicans strains isolated from HIV-infected patients – residents of Moscow.
  2. Except for V488I, the detected mutations do not have any association with the ERG11 gene overexpression.
  3. C. albicans strains – mutation carriers – were up to 100 times more sensitive to triazole antimycotics. The presence of mutations had no effect on the sensitivity to echinocandins, polyene, and pyrimidine.

 

Ethics approval. The study was conducted with the informed consent of the patients. The research protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the South Ural State Medical University (protocol No. 4, April 25, 2014).

Funding source. This study was not supported by any external sources of funding.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

Author contribution. Аll authors made a substantial contribution to the conception of the work, acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data for the work, drafting and revising the work, final approval of the version to be published.

1 Russian clinical classification of HIV infection. URL: https://base.garant.ru/12145892 (In Russ.)

2 Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Determination of the sensitivity of microorganisms to antimicrobial drugs: Recommendations. 2021. URL: https://www.antibiotic.ru/minzdrav/category/clinical-recommendations/

×

About the authors

Yuri V. Nesvizhsky

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute for Epidemiology and Microbiology

Author for correspondence.
Email: nesviz@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0386-3883

D. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Department of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Chief Researcher, G.N. Gabrichevsky Research Institute for Epidemiology and Microbiology

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Stanislav S. Afanasiev

G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute for Epidemiology and Microbiology

Email: nesviz@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6497-1795

D. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Main Researcher

Russian Federation, Moscow

Alexander D. Voropaev

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: nesviz@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6431-811X

Postgraduate Student

Russian Federation, Moscow

Yulia N. Urban

G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute for Epidemiology and Microbiology

Email: nesviz@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0189-3608

Сand. Sci. (Biol.), Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Biotechnology

Russian Federation, Moscow

Mariam E. Suleimanova

Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery

Email: nesviz@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9255-6481

Resident

Russian Federation, Moscow

Maxim S. Afanasiev

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: nesviz@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5860-4152

D. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Chair of Clinical Allergology and Immunology

Russian Federation, Moscow

Elena V. Budanova

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: nesviz@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1864-5635

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associated Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Elena A. Voropaeva

G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute for Epidemiology and Microbiology

Email: nesviz@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0463-0136

D. Sci. (Biol.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Enoch D.A., Yang H., Aliyu S.H., Micallef C. The changing epidemiology of invasive fungal infections. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017;1508:17–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6515-1_2
  2. Pfaller M.A., Diekema D.J., Gibbs D.L., et al. Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study, 1997 to 2007: a 10.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of Candida species to fluconazole and voriconazole as determined by CLSI standardized disk diffusion. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010;48(4):1366–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.02117-09
  3. Biswas C., Chen S.C., Halliday C., et al. Identification of genetic markers of resistance to echinocandins, azoles and 5-fluorocytosine in Candida glabrata by next-generation sequencing: a feasibility study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2017;23(9):676.e7–e.10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.03.014
  4. Sanguinetti M., Posteraro B., Lass-Flörl C. Antifungal drug resistance among Candida species: mechanisms and clinical impact. Mycoses. 2015;58(Suppl. 2):2–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.12330
  5. Godinho C. P., Sá-Correia I. Physiological Genomics of Multistress Resistance in the Yeast Cell Model and Factory: Focus on MDR/MXR Transporters Progress in Molecular and Subcellular Biology. Cham; 2019:1–35.
  6. Castanheira M., Deshpande L.M., Messer S.A., et al. Analysis of global antifungal surveillance results reveals predominance of Erg11 Y132F alteration among azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis and country-specific isolate dissemination. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2020;55(1):105799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.09.003
  7. Cernicka J., Subik J. Resistance mechanisms in fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans isolates from vaginal candidiasis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2006;27(5):403–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.12.005
  8. Lim H.J., Shin J.H., Kim M.N., et al. Evaluation of two commercial broth microdilution methods using different interpretive criteria for the detection of molecular mechanisms of acquired azole and echinocandin resistance in four common Candida species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020;64(11):e00740-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00740-20
  9. Lopes W., Vainstein M.H., Schrank A. Revealing colonial characteristics of Candida tropicalis by high-resolution scanning electron microscopy. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019;25(2):188–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.06.032
  10. Pappas P.G., Kauffman C.A., Andes D.R., et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016;62(4):e1–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ933
  11. Bertout S., Dunyach C., Drakulovski P., et al. Comparison of the Sensititre YeastOne® dilution method with the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A3 microbroth dilution reference method for determining MIC of eight antifungal agents on 102 yeast strains. Pathol. Biol. (Paris). 2011;59(1):48–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patbio.2010.07.020
  12. Sanguinetti M., Posteraro B. Susceptibility testing of fungi to antifungal drugs. J. Fungi. (Basel). 2018;4(3):110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4030110
  13. Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
  14. Men A., Wilson P., Siemering K., Forrest S. Sanger DNA Sequencing. Weinheim; 2008:1–11.
  15. Virtanen P., Gommers R., Oliphant T.E., et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods. 2020;17(3):261–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
  16. Hunter J.D. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2007;9(3):90–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
  17. Xu Y., Chen L., Li C. Susceptibility of clinical isolates of Candida species to fluconazole and detection of Candida albicans ERG11 mutations. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008;61(4):798–804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn015
  18. Chau A.S., Mendrick C.A., Sabatelli F.J., et al. Application of real-time quantitative PCR to molecular analysis of Candida albicans strains exhibiting reduced susceptibility to azoles. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004;48(6):2124–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.48.6.2124-2131.2004
  19. Favre B., Didmon M., Ryder N.S. Multiple amino acid substitutions in lanosterol 14α-demethylase contribute to azole resistance in Candida albicans. Microbiology (Reading). 1999;145(Pt. 10):2715–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-145-10-2715
  20. Flowers S.A., Colón B., Whaley S.G., et al. Contribution of clinically derived mutations in ERG11 to azole resistance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015;59(1): 450–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.03470-14
  21. Goldman G.H., da Silva Ferreira M.E., dos Reis Marques E., et al. Evaluation of fluconazole resistance mechanisms in candida albicans clinical isolates from HIV-infected patients in Brazil. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2004;50(1):25–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2004.04.009
  22. Kakeya H., Miyazaki Y., Miyazaki H., et al. Genetic analysis of azole resistance in the Darlington strain of Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000;44(11):2985–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.44.11.2985-2990.2000
  23. Kelly S.L., Lamb D.C., Kelly D.E. Y132H substitution in Candida albicans sterol 14α-demethylase confers fluconazole resistance by preventing binding to haem. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999;180(2):171–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb08792.x
  24. Perea S., López-Ribot J.L., Kirkpatrick W.R., et al. Prevalence of molecular mechanisms of resistance to azole antifungal agents in Candida albicans strains displaying high-level fluconazole resistance isolated from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001;45(10):2676–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.45.10.2676-2684.2001
  25. Sanglard D., Ischer F., Koymans L., et al. Amino acid substitutions in the cytochrome p-450 lanosterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51A1) from azole-resistant Candida albicans clinical isolates contribute to resistance to azole antifungal agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998;42(2):241–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.42.2.241
  26. Xiang M.J., Liu J.Y., Ni P.H., et al. Erg11 mutations associated with azole resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Res. 2013;13(4):386–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1567-1364.12042
  27. Franz R., Kelly S.L., Lamb D.C., et al. Multiple molecular mechanisms contribute to a stepwise development of fluconazole resistance in clinical Candida albicans strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998;42(12):3065–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.42.12.3065
  28. Li X., Brown N., Chau A.S., et al. Changes in susceptibility to posaconazole in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004;53(1):74–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh027
  29. Marichal P., Koymans L., Willemsens S., et al. Contribution of mutations in the cytochrome P450 14alpha-demethylase (Erg11p, Cyp51p) to azole resistance in Candida albicans. Microbiology (Reading). 1999;145(Pt. 10):2701–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-145-10-2701
  30. Kelly S.L., Lamb D.C., Loeffler J., et al. The G464S amino acid substitution in Candida albicans sterol 14alpha-demethylase causes fluconazole resistance in the clinic through reduced affinity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999;262(1):174–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1999.1136
  31. Favre B., Ryder N.S., Didmon M. Multiple amino acid substitutions in lanosterol 14α-demethylase contribute to azole resistance in Candida albicans. Microbiology (Reading). 1999;145(Pt. 10): 2715–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-145-10-2715
  32. Finkina E.I., Bogdanov I.V., Ignatova A.A., et al. Antifungal activity, structural stability, and immunomodulatory effects on human immune cells of defensin from the lentil Lens culinaris. Membranes (Basel). 2022;12(9):855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12090855
  33. Lee Y., Puumala E., Robbins N., Cowen L.E. Antifungal drug resistance: molecular mechanisms in Candida albicans and beyond. Chem. Rev. 2020;121(6):3390–411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00199
  34. Whaley S.G., Berkow E.L., Rybak J.M., et al. Azole antifungal resistance in Candida albicans and emerging non-albicans Candida species. Front. Microbiol. 2017;7:2173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02173
  35. White P.L., Price J.S., Cordey A., Backx M. Molecular diagnosis of yeast infections. Curr. Fungal Infection Rep. 2021;15(3):67–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-021-00421-x
  36. Ruhnke M., Eigler A., Tennagen I., et al. Emergence of fluconazole-resistant strains of Candida albicans in patients with recurrent oropharyngeal candidosis and human immunodeficiency virus infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994;32(9):2092–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.32.9.2092-2098.1994
  37. Gabaldón T., Fairhead C. Genomes shed light on the secret life of Candida glabrata: not so asexual, not so commensal. Curr. Genet. 2019;65(1):93–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-018-0867-z

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Nesvizhsky Y.V., Afanasiev S.S., Voropaev A.D., Urban Y.N., Suleimanova M.E., Afanasiev M.S., Budanova E.V., Voropaeva E.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ПИ № ФС77-75442 от 01.04.2019 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies