Production of Bst polymerase for diagnosis of different infections using loop-mediated isothermal amplification

Abstract

Introduction. The large fragment of DNA polymerase I from Geobacillus stearothermophilus GIM1.543 (Bst DNA polymerase) possesses 5'-3' DNA polymerase activity, 5'-3' displacement activity and high processivity. These properties make it possible to use Bst DNA polymerase in loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), which provides highly specific amplification of the target sequence and is used for rapid detection of agents causing human infectious diseases.

The purpose of the study was to produce a recombinant Bst polymerase enzyme in the bacterial expression system and to assess its properties for LAMP-based diagnostics of infectious diseases.

Materials and methods. Expression constructs carrying the Bst polymerase gene were obtained using genetic engineering techniques. Different Escherichia coli strains were used for protein expression. Metal-chelate and gel filtration chromatography techniques were used for protein purification. Catalytic characteristics of the enzyme were assessed in loop-mediated isothermal amplification reactions using AmpliSens® SARS-CoV-2-IT, AmpliSens® IAV-IT and AmpliSens® IBV-IT diagnostic systems designed for high-quality detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A virus (IAV) and influenza B virus (IBV) RNA, respectively.

Results. The offered protocol for production, extraction and purification of recombinant Bst polymerase makes it possible to produce the enzyme in the bacterial expression system using E. coli cells in a soluble form and reaching the yield up to 20% of the total cell mass. In LAMP reactions, the obtained enzyme demonstrates activity comparable with that of the commercial enzyme Bst 2.0 (NEB).

Conclusion. Considering the fast purification and production of the enzyme, the obtained recombinant Bst polymerase can be used in LAMP-based diagnostic kits.

Full Text

Introduction

Nucleic acid amplification methods are widely used for diagnostics of infectious diseases, for detection of single nucleotide substitutions in genotyping and for other clinical purposes. However, the conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a time-consuming process and requires expensive specialized equipment. The comparatively recent technique developed by Notomi et al. for rapid detection of nucleic acid bases is loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity in amplification of the target DNA sequence at constant temperatures in any temperature-controlled equipment, requiring no thermal cycles and speeding up the process [1–4]. The LAMP technique is widely used for detection of agents of infectious diseases of viral etiology such as SARS-CoV-2 [5], influenza viruses and respiratory syncytial virus [6], hepatitis C virus [7], dengue virus DENV [8], human immunodeficiency virus HIV [9], and Ebola virus EVD [10].

Bst polymerase has been extensively used in isothermal amplification and has played a key role in the development of rapid clinical diagnosis of viral infections. DNA polymerase I from Geobacillus stearothermophilus [11] was first isolated in 1972 [12] and purified in 1982 [13]. The three-dimensional structure of the enzyme led to the conclusion that DNA polymerase I is comprised of 3 distinct domains [14]. Domain I is responsible for 5'-3' exonuclease activity; domain II is responsible for 5'-3' DNA polymerase activity; domain III resembles domains responsible for 3'-5' exonuclease activity in other polymerases [14]. Domains II and III are located at the C terminus of DNA polymerase I and are referred to as the large fragment (LF) [15]. The full-length DNA polymerase I gene from Geobacillus stearothermophilus consists of 2,628 base pairs and encodes a protein composed of 876 amino acids, with the weight of 98 kDa. The truncated Bst polymerase LF gene, which lacks the 5' terminus of 930 base pairs, encodes a protein of 587 aa, with weight of 64 kDa, and can be cloned with the C-terminal polyhistidine tag, with an estimated weight of 65 kDa. In this case, due to the presence of the hexahistidine tag at the C terminus of the gene, Bst polymerase lacks 5'-3' exonuclease activity and was demonstrated to be efficient in dNTP polymerization in PCR [16, 17]. In the meantime, there are works reporting cloning of Bst polymerase LF gene without a fusion tag to avoid misfolding of the recombinant protein [18].

Since Bst DNA polymerase has high processivity, polymerase and displacement activity, is able to remain active at 65ºC [17] for a long time, and is widely used in isothermal amplification for rapid detection of infectious diseases, the purpose of this study is to offer an efficient method of production and purification of Bst polymerase suitable for diagnostic application in LAMP.

Materials and methods

The study was performed using NdeI and XhoI restriction endonucleases (Thermo Scientific), pET16b+ (Merck Millipore), E. coli strains XL2, ER2566, BL21 (DE3) pLys, Rosetta (DE3) (Merck Millipore); the growth media included bacto tryptone, bacto agar, and yeast extract (Helicon); for protein extraction – tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane hydrochloride (Tris-HCl), NaCl, imidazole, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) disodium salt, glycerol (Panreac); PageRuler™ Prestained Protein Ladder, 10–250 kDa (Thermo Scientific).

Obtaining a plasmid expression vector containing a Bst polymerase gene

Oligonucleotide primers were used for amplification of the gene encoding Bst polymerase:

Bst-for 5’-GGTGGTCATATGCCGTCTTCTGAGGAAGAAAAGCCGCTG-3`;

Bst-rev 5’-GGTGGTTAACTCGAGTTTCGCTCATACCAAGTAGAACCGTAGT-3’,

containing recognition sites of NdeI and XhoI restriction enzymes, respectively (underlined).

The resulting amplicons were treated with NdeI and XhoI restriction endonucleases and cloned into plasmid vector pET16b+, which was pretreated with the same restriction endonucleases. As a result, we were able to construct the pET16-Bst-NHm4 expression vector. The correctness of the nucleotide sequence of the cloned gene was confirmed by sequencing.

Selection of E. coli strains for expression of the Bst-NHm4 gene

E. coli strains ER2566, BL21 (DE3) pLys, and Rosetta (DE3) were used as carrier strains for the constructed pET16-Bst-NHm4 vector. Transformed cells were seeded in the LB medium (1% bacto tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 1% NaCl) with agar containing 100 µg/ml of ampicillin for ER2566 cells and 20 µg/ml of chloramphenicol for BL21 (DE3) pLys and Rosetta (DE3) cells, and were grown for 14 hours at 37ºC to obtain colonies. Then, several colonies were transferred to 100 ml of the LB medium supplemented with 100 µg/ml of ampicillin and grown for 16 hours at 37ºC in a shaker at 180 rpm. The overnight culture of E. coli producer strains BL21 (DE3)pLys/pET16-Bst-NHm4, ER2566/pET16-Bst-NHm4 and Rosetta (DE3)/pET16- Bst-NHm4 was seeded in the LB medium supplemented with 100 µg/ml of ampicillin in Erlenmeyer flasks (the cell confluency was 2%) and grown at 37ºC at 160 rpm. When the optical density reached 0.8 AU, isopropyl-β-D1-thiogalactopyranoside was added to a concentration of 0.4 mM and the culture was grown at 23ºC and 37ºC for 4 hours and 24 hours. The optical density was measured spectrophotometrically at a wavelenght of 595 nm on a BioPhotometer Plus (Eppendorf). Cells were collected by centrifugation at 4,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C using the Avanti JXN-30 centrifuge (Beckman Coulter).

Extraction of Bst-NHm4

The cell pellets (2 g) of the E. coli producer strain BL21 (DE3)pLys/pET16-Bst-NHm4 were resuspended in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5 with 1 mM PMSF at a ratio of 1:10 (w/v) and lysed by sonication using the Branson sonifier 250 (Branson Ultrasonics) for 20 min at 4ºC (the cycle – 0.5 sec, the amplitude – 50%). Then, they were centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 30 min in the Allegra X-30R centrifuge (Beckman Coulter). After the centrifugation, the supernatant was diluted 2-fold with buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5 (buffer A) and applied to the IMAC FF chromatography sorbent pre-equilibrated with the same buffer. Buffer A was used for removal of ballast proteins. The target protein was eluted with a liner gradient of buffer A with 500 mM imidazole.

Following the metal-chelate chromatography, the eluate was applied to the HiTrap column containing 5 ml of G-25 sorbent in buffer of 50 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 20% glycerol, pH 8.5.

Assessment of Bst-NHm4 activity

To assess the activity of the Bst polymerase obtained in LAMP, we used reagents of the AmpliSens® SARS-CoV-2-IT kit (RU No. RZN 2021/14599); plasmid DNA containing the target fragment of the SARS-CoV-2 genome was used as a sample. The reaction mixture in a volume of 10 µl contained 5 µl of SARS-CoV-2 IT-mix, 4.2 µl of glycerol, thioglycerol, and fluorescent intercalating dye mixture, and 0.8 µl of tested Bst polymerase. Bst 2.0 DNA Polymerase enzyme (NEB; hereinafter referred to as Bst 2.0) was used as a reference enzyme; the reaction mixture contained 5 µl of IT-mix SARS-CoV-2, 4 µl of glycerol, thioglycerol, and fluorescent intercalating dye mixture, and 1 µl of Bst 2.0 polymerase. The prepared reaction mixtures were supplemented with 10 µl of plasmid DNA (at a concentration of 104 and 106 copies/ml). Each sample was represented in 2 repeats. The reaction was performed in the CFX 96 thermocycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The amplification program consisted of 50 cycles lasting 30 sec at 65ºC for 25 min with signal detection in the FAM channel.

Analytical methods

The protein concentration was measured using QubitTM (Thermo Scientific); the purity of a protein was estimated using denaturating SDS-PAGE electrophoresis [19].

Reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification

To assess the possibility of using the received Bst polymerase in diagnostic testing systems, we performed real-time reverse transcription LAMP using reagents from AmpliSens® SARS-CoV-2-IT, AmpliSens® IAV-IT, and AmpliSens® IBV-IT kits designed for qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2, IAV, and IBV RNA, respectively. Samples were represented by dilutions of viral RNA specimens from biological materials (nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs) at a concentration of 104–107 copies/ml.

The reaction mixture in a volume of 10 µl contained 5 µl of the pathogen-specific reagent of IT-mix, 4.2 µl of glycerol, thioglycerol, and fluorescent intercalating dye mixture, and 0.8 µl of Bst polymerase. The reference enzyme was represented by Bst 2.0 polymerase diluted to the concentration identical to that of the tested enzyme, 320 U/ml (1 unit of the enzyme catalyzes the incorporation of 25 nmol of dNTP into the product in 30 min at 65ºC). The reaction mixtures were supplemented with 10 µl of RNA. The reaction was performed in the DTprime thermocycler (DNA-Technology). The amplification program included preliminary incubation for 5 min at 37ºC and isothermal amplification for 25 min (50 cycles) at 65ºC with detection of a fluorescent signal every 30 sec in the FAM channel.

Licensed PCR-based reagent kits, AmpliSens® COVID-19-FL (RU No. RZN 2021/14599) and AmpliSens® Influenza virus A/B-FL (RU No. FSR 2009/05010) manufactured by the Central Research Institute of Epidemiology were used for the reference analysis of RNA samples.

Results

The unique synthetic sequence of the Bst-pol gene was developed to produce recombinant Bst polymerase. For this purpose, we initially performed reverse translation of the fragment of the amino acid sequence of DNA polymerase I from Geobacillus stearothermophilus (AAB52611) from 290 to 876 aa. Then, we optimized the nucleotide composition of the sequence with consideration for the frequency of codon occurrence for the bacterial expression system based on E. coli cells. The final gene sequence was obtained by assembly of long overlapping primers [20]. The gene encoding Bst-pol was cloned into the plasmid vector pET16b+ for prokaryotic expression in E. coli. During the selection of carrier strains for expression of the Bst-NHm4 gene, we analyzed the changes in accumulation of the Bst-NHm4 enzyme at different temperatures (23ºC and 37ºC) and depending on the protein biosynthesis induction time (4 and 24 hours). Generally, the protein was effectively produced in E. coli carrier strains BL21 (DE3) pLys and Rosetta (DE3) in a soluble form; however, it was not produced in the carrier strain ER2566. Slightly higher biomass yields were achieved when the producer strain BL21 (DE3)pLys/ pET16- Bst-NHm4 was cultured at 23ºC for 4 hours (Table 1).

 

Table 1. Content of the Bst-NHm4 enzyme in producer strains compared to total cell protein

E. coli carrier strain

Culture conditions

Protein content, %

Cell biomass yield, g/L

ER2566

23ºC, 4 h

Bst-NHm4 enzyme is not accumulated

23ºC, 24 h

37ºC, 4 h

37ºC, 24 h

BL21 (De3) pLys

23ºC, 4 h

20,2

4,8

23ºC, 24 h

19,8

4,5

37ºC, 4 h

19,7

4,2

37ºC, 24 h

18,9

4,9

Rosetta (De3)

23ºC, 4 h

19,5

5,1

23ºC, 24 h

19,3

4,9

37ºC, 4 h

18,8

4,5

37ºC, 24 h

18,7

4,7

Note. The data were obtained using the Image Lab v. 5.2.1 software (Bio-Rad).

 

During the first stage, metal-chelate affinity chromatography with an imidazole gradient was used to purify the enzyme from cellular proteins (Fig. 1). Fractions having purity of more than 90% (Fig. 2) were pooled and gel-filtration chromatography was performed. The resulting Bst-NHm4 enzyme was characterized using SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. The electrophoretic analysis showed that the purity of the enzyme was at least 95% (Fig. 3) at a concentration of 0.85 mg/ml.

 

Fig. 1. Chromatographic profile of purification of the recombinant Bst-NHm4 enzyme using IMAC FF sorbent.

 

Fig. 2. Chromatographic purification of Bst-pol using IMAC FF sorbent. M — molecular weight marker; 1 — clarified cell lysate of the producer strain BL21 (DE3)pLys/pET16-Bst-NHm4; 2 — ballast proteins; 314 — Bst-NHm4 fractions.

 

Fig. 3. Production and purification of Bst-NHm4. M — molecular weight marker; 1 — total cell lysate; 2 — clarified cell lysate; 3 — cell sediment; 4 — total fraction of Bst-NHm4 after metal-chelate affinity chromatography; 5 — total fraction of Bst-NHm4 after gel-filtration chromatography.

 

The activity of the extracted Bst-NHm4 enzyme was verified by real-time LAMP using samples of plasmid DNA containing a fragment of the SARS-CoV-2 genome.

The test was performed using enzymes at a concentration of 320 U/ml. There were also two concentrations of DNA template: 102 and 104 copies (Table 2). Fig. 4 clearly shows that the produced Bst_NHm4 polymerase demonstrates higher activity (lower Ct values) in the LAMP reaction with DNA samples compared to the reference enzyme Bst 2.0.

 

Table 2. Cycle threshold values using Bst-NHm4 in the LAMP reaction

Sample No.

Sample type

Bst polymerase

Ct values (FAM)

1

Control

Bst 2.0

2

Control

Bst-NHm4

 

Number of copies

  

3

102

Bst 2.0

30,1

4

102

Bst 2.0

32,3

5

102

Bst 2.0

31,0

6

102

Bst 2.0

33,4

7

102

Bst-NHm4

22,0

8

102

Bst-NHm4

22,4

9

102

Bst-NHm4

24,1

10

102

Bst-NHm4

24,9

11

104

Bst 2.0

22,2

12

104

Bst 2.0

22,8

13

104

Bst 2.0

24,0

14

104

Bst 2.0

24,3

15

104

Bst-NHm4

20,2

16

104

Bst-NHm4

19,8

17

104

Bst-NHm4

20,9

18

104

Bst-NHm4

22,1

 

Fig. 4. Assessment of Bst-NHm4 polymerase activity in the model system. a — product accumulation curves; b — mean cycle threshold value.

 

The activity of the Bst-NHm4 enzyme was verified by the analysis of SARS-CoV-2, IAV, and IBV RNA samples isolated from biological material (nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs) using reverse transcription LAMP and reagents from AmpliSens® SARS-CoV-2-IT, AmpliSens® IAV-IT, and AmpliSens® IBV-IT kits compared to the Bst 2.0 enzyme. For control purposes, RNA samples were analyzed using reverse transcription PCR with AmpliSens® COVID-19-FL reagent kit or PCR with AmpliSens® Influenza virus A/B-FL reagent kit and cDNA that had been obtained using REVERTA-L reagent kit.

The Bst_NHm4 polymerase demonstrates the activity comparable to that of the Bst 2.0 polymerase in the LAMP reaction with SARS-CoV-2 RNA samples; however, its activity is lower (higher Ct values) with IAV and IBV RNA samples using respective reagent kits (Fig. 5). Despite the delay in passing of IBV RNA samples in reaction with the Bst-NHm4 polymerase compared to Bst 2.0, the tested RNA samples were identified as positive, and it was sufficient for diagnostic systems with qualitative detection.

 

Fig. 5. Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 (a), IAV (b), and IBV (c) RNA samples isolated from biological material (nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs) using reverse transcription LAMP.

 

According to the user guides for AmpliSens® SARS-CoV-2-IT, AmpliSens® IAV-IT, and AmpliSens® IBV-IT reagent kits, they have a detection limit of max 104 copies/ml when used for RNA extraction from biological material with reagents from the RIBO-prep kit and high specificity provided by 4–6 diagnostic primers that are complementary to 6–8 regions of the target DNA.

The obtained results confirm that LAMP-based reagent kits have high diagnostic specificity (100%) compared to PCR test systems when used for analysis of RNA samples at a concentration of minimum 104 copies/ml. A major advantage of LAMP-based reagent kits is a significant reduction in the testing time (31 min) compared to PCR using AmpliSens® COVID-19-FL (103 min) and AmpliSens® Influenza virus A/B-FL (150 min) reagent kits due to the shorter time required for the amplification program.

The findings demonstrate that the developed construct and the protocol for extraction and purification of Bst-NHm4 polymerase enzyme have promising prospects and need to be further studied to be used in new and existing reagent kits for LAMP-based diagnostics of different infections.

Conclusion

The offered protocol for extraction and purification of the enzyme provides an efficient method for obtaining recombinant Bst polymerase in a soluble form, with the protein yield reaching up to 19–20% of the total cell mass. Thus, considering the fast and efficient method of purification and production of the enzyme, Bst-NHm4 is suitable for further application in LAMP for diagnostic purposes.

Funding source. Тhe research was funded by the State budget (Federal project "Sanitary shield of the country — safety for health (prevention, detection, response)”).

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

×

About the authors

Maria I. Pika

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology

Email: cherkashina@pcr.ms
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3279-6811

junior researcher, Research group of genetic engineering and biotechnology

Russian Federation, Moscow

Olga O. Mikheeva

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology

Email: cherkashina@pcr.ms
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1721-5134

researcher, Research group of genetic engineering and biotechnology

Russian Federation, Moscow

Elena D. Solovyova

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology

Email: cherkashina@pcr.ms
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0762-0347

junior researcher, Research group of genetic engineering and biotechnology

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anna V. Valdokhina

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology

Email: cherkashina@pcr.ms
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4592-4755

researcher, Research group of genetic engineering and biotechnology

Russian Federation, Moscow

Victoria P. Bulanenko

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology

Email: cherkashina@pcr.ms
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7055-1762

researcher, Research group of genetic engineering and biotechnology

Russian Federation, Moscow

Evgeny A. Cherkashin

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology

Email: cherkashina@pcr.ms
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3627-6047

Cand. Sci. (Chem.), Head, Center for development, product development and innovation — Deputy head, Production department

Russian Federation, Moscow

Vadim V. Petrov

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology

Email: cherkashina@pcr.ms
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3503-2366

Head, Research group of development of new molecular biological technologies

Russian Federation, Moscow

Kirill V. Krasovitov

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology

Email: cherkashina@pcr.ms
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7237-1810

technologist-developer, Research group of development of new molecular biological technologies

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anna S. Cherkashina

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology

Author for correspondence.
Email: cherkashina@pcr.ms
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7970-7495

Cand. Sci. (Chem.), Head, Research group of genetic engineering and biotechnology

Russian Federation, Moscow

Vasily G. Akimkin

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology

Email: cherkashina@pcr.ms
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4228-9044

D. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Notomi T., Okayama H., Masubuchi H., et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28(12):E63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.12.e63
  2. Oscorbin I.P., Boyarskikh U.A., Filipenko M.L. Large fragment of DNA polymerase I from Geobacillus sp. 777: cloning and comparison with DNA polymerases I in practical applications. Mol. Biotechnol. 2015;57(10):947–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-015-9886-x
  3. Becherer L., Borst N., Bakheit M., et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)-review and classification of methods for sequence-specific detection. Anal. Methods. 2020;12(6):717–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9AY02246E
  4. Soroka M., Wasowicz B., Rymaszewska A. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): The better sibling of PCR? Cells. 2021;10(8):1931. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10081931
  5. Moore K.J.M., Cahill J., Aidelberg G., et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification detection of SARS-CoV-2 and myriad other applications. J. Biomol. Tech. 2021;32(3):228–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7171/jbt.21-3203-017
  6. Акимкин В.Г., Петров В.В., Красовитов К.В. и др. Молеку- лярные методы диагностики новой коронавирусной инфекции: сравнение петлевой изотермической амплификации и полимеразной цепной реакции. Вопросы вирусологии. 2021; 66(6):417–424. Akimkin V.G., Petrov V.V., Krasovitov K.V., et al. Molecular methods for diagnosing novel coronavirus infection: comparison of loop-mediated isothermal amplification and polymerase chain reaction. Problems of Virology. 2021;66(6):417–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36233/0507-4088-86
  7. Takayama I., Nakauchi M., Takahashi H., et al. Development of real-time fluorescent reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay with quenching primer for influenza virus and respiratory syncytial virus. J. Virol. Methods. 2019;267:53–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.02.010
  8. Wang Q.Q., Zhang J., Hu J.S., et al. Rapid detection of hepatitis C virus RNA by a reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2011;63(1):144–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2011.00828.x
  9. Parida M., Horioke K., Ishida H., et al. Rapid detection and differentiation of dengue virus serotypes by a real-time reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43(6):2895–903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.6.2895-2903.2005
  10. Curtis K.A., Rudolph D.L., Owen S.M. Rapid detection of HIV-1 by reverse-transcription, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP). J. Virol. Methods. 2008;151(2):264–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.04.011
  11. Kurosaki Y., Takada A., Ebihara H., et al. Rapid and simple detection of Ebola virus by reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification. J. Virol. Methods. 2007;141(1):78–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.11.031
  12. Wada K., Suzuki H. Biotechnological platforms of the moderate thermophiles, Geobacillus species: notable properties and genetic tools. In: Salwan R., Sharma V., eds. Physiological and Biotechnological Aspects of Extremophiles. Academic Press; 2020:195–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-03860-8
  13. Stenesh J., Roe B.A. DNA polymerase from mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria: I. Purification and properties of DNA polymerase from Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus stearothermophilus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1972;272:156–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2787(72)90240-7
  14. Kaboev O.K., Luchkina L.A., Akhmedov A.T., Bekker M.L. Purification and properties of deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase from Bacillus stearothermophilus. J. Bacteriol. 1981;145(1):21–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.145.1.21-26.1981
  15. Steitz T.A. DNA polymerases: structural diversity and common mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274(25):17395–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.25.17395
  16. Phang S.M., Teo C.Y., Lo E., Wong V.W. Cloning and complete sequence of the DNA polymerase-encoding gene (BstpolI) and characterisation of the Klenow-like fragment from Bacillus stearothermophilus. Gene. 1995;163(1):65–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(95)00387-l
  17. Lawyer F.C., Stoffel S., Saiki R.K., et al. High-level expression, purification, and enzymatic characterization of full-length Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase and a truncated form deficient in 5′ to 3′ exonuclease activity. PCR Methods Appl. 1993;2(4):275–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2.4.275
  18. Li P., Amenov A., Kalendar R., et al. Cloning and purification of large fragment of DNA polymerase I from Geobacillus stearothermophilus and it’s application in isothermal DNA amplification. Eurasian Journal of Applied Biotechnology. 2017;(1):50–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11134/btp.1.2017.6. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/zbenmt
  19. Kordyukova M.Y., Antipova V.N., Rogachevsky V.V., Zyrina NV. An acid precipitation technique: A strip assay for the large-scale DNA polymerase activity screening. Anal. Biochem. 2016;513:39–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2016.08.022
  20. Laemmli U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970; 227(5259):680–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
  21. Черкашина А.С., Пика М.И., Михеева О.О. и др. ФБУН ЦНИИ Эпидемиологии Роспотребнадзора. Способ получения большого фрагмента Bst-полимеразы. Заявка на патент RU 2022135005. Заявл. 28.12.2022. Cherkashina A.S., Pika M.I., Mikheeva O.O., et al. CRIE. Method for obtaining a large fragment of Bst-polymerase. Patent application RU 2022135005; 28.12.2022.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Chromatographic profile of purification of the recombinant Bst-NHm4 enzyme using IMAC FF sorbent.

Download (89KB)
3. Fig. 2. Chromatographic purification of Bst-pol using IMAC FF sorbent. M — molecular weight marker; 1 — clarified cell lysate of the producer strain BL21 (DE3)pLys/pET16-Bst-NHm4; 2 — ballast proteins; 3–14 — Bst-NHm4 fractions.

Download (72KB)
4. Fig. 3. Production and purification of Bst-NHm4. M — molecular weight marker; 1 — total cell lysate; 2 — clarified cell lysate; 3 — cell sediment; 4 — total fraction of Bst-NHm4 after metal-chelate affinity chromatography; 5 — total fraction of Bst-NHm4 after gel-filtration chromatography.

Download (68KB)
5. Fig. 4. Assessment of Bst-NHm4 polymerase activity in the model system. a — product accumulation curves; b — mean cycle threshold value.

Download (121KB)
6. Fig. 5. Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 (a), IAV (b), and IBV (c) RNA samples isolated from biological material (nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs) using reverse transcription LAMP.

Download (106KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Pika M.I., Mikheeva O.O., Solovyova E.D., Valdokhina A.V., Bulanenko V.P., Cherkashin E.A., Petrov V.V., Krasovitov K.V., Cherkashina A.S., Akimkin V.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ПИ № ФС77-75442 от 01.04.2019 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies