ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVENESS OF USING IgY FROM CHICKEN IN SANDWICH METHOD OF HBsAg TESTING

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. Study antigen-binding ability of polyclonal antibodies (PCA) of chicken compared with monoclonal antibodies (MCA) of mice in the model of interaction with HBsAg. Materials and methods. Mice MCA 18C8 and MKA F3/F4 (IgG) were used, effective in enzyme immunoassay sandwich method of HBsAg determination (with a minimal detection dose of 0.017 ng/ml), and affinity purified anti-HBsAg PCA of chicken (IgY), obtained from 2 immunized birds (PCA No. 1 and PCA No. 2). The ability of antibodies to bind HBsAg was evaluated by analytical sensitivity (slope of binding curve) of solid-phase enzyme immunoassay system using mice MCA and chicken PCA. Results. PCA No. 2 has provided a statistically significant 40% increase of analytical sensitivity, compared with «standard» immobilized MCA 18C8, in model experiments of binding of peroxidase-labeled HBsAg. However, transition from model experiments to use of PKA No. 1 and PICA No. 2 in sandwich method of determination of HBsAg instead of immobilized MCA 18C8 or detecting MCA F3/F4 in all the cases, on the contrary, resulted in a decrease of analytical sensitivity. Conclusion. A lower flexibility of chicken PCA was assumed to be able to impede bivalent interaction in sandwich method, resulting in formation of less stable immune complexes. Without challenging value of IgY for the creation of immunochemical diagnostic methods, these facts and assumptions indicate a necessity of a deeper elucidation of the best areas of their application.

About the authors

A. A. Pechelyulko

Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera

Author for correspondence.
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Russian Federation

Yu. N. Tarakanova

Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Russian Federation

A. D. Dmitriev

Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Russian Federation

Yu. S. Massino

Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Russian Federation

O. L. Segal

Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Russian Federation

V. F. Lavrov

Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera; Russian Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Russian Federation

D. A. Dmitriev

Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Яковлева Д.А., Дмитриев А.Д., Дмитриев Д.А., Массино Ю.С., Павлова Е.В., Пыренкова И.Ю., Смирнова М.Б., Сегал О.Л., Тараканова Ю.Н., Уланова Т.И., Фартушная О.Н., Шарипова И.Н., Коляскина Г.И., Лавров В.Ф. Использование рН-чувствительных иммобилизованных моноклональных антител для оптимизации иммуноферментного сэндвич-метода определения поверхностного антигена вируса гепатита В (HBsAg). Журн. микробиол. 2010, 2: 85-89.
  2. Butler J.E., Ni L., Nessler R. et al. The physical and functional behavior of capture antibodies adsorbed on polysterene. J. Immunol. Methods. 1992, 150: 77-90.
  3. Camenisch G., Tini M., Chilov D. et al. General applicability of chicken egg yolk antibodies: the performance of IgY immunoglobulins raised against the hypoxia-inducible factor la. FASE В J. 1999, 13:81-88.
  4. Dmitriev A. D., Tarakanova J.N., Yakovleva D.A., Dmitriev D.A., PhartooshinaO.V., Kolyaskina G.I., Massino Yu.S., Borisova O.V., Segal O.L., Smirnova M.B., Ulanova T.I., Lavrov V.F. Monoclonal antibodies requiring coating buffer with low pH for efficient antigen capture in sandwich ELISA: the rarities or practically important phenomena? J. Immunoassay. Immunochem. 2013, 34: 414-437.
  5. Nikulina V.A., Kizim E.A., Massino Y.S., Segal O.L., Smirnova M.B., Avilov V.V., Saprigin D.B., Smotrov S.P., Tichtchenko V.A., Kolyaskina G.I., Dmitriev A.D. Synergistic effects in antigen-capture ELISA using three monoclonal antibodies directed at different epitopes of the same antigen. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2000, 299: 25-44.
  6. Pardue H.L. The inseparable triad: analytical sensitivity, measurement uncertainty, and quantitative resolution. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43: 1831-1837.
  7. Poison A:, von Wechmar M.B., Fazakerley G. Antibodies to proteins from yolk of immunized hens. Immunol Commun. 1980, 9: 495-514.
  8. Schade R., Calzado E. G., Sarmiento R. et al. Chicken egg yolk antibodies (IgY-technology): a review of progress in production and use in research and human and veterinary medicine. Altem. Lab Anim. 2005, 33: 129-154.
  9. Spillner E., Braren I., Greunke K. et al. Avian IgY antibodies and their recombinant equivalents in research, diagnostics and therapy. Biologicals. 2012, 40: 313-22.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2016 Pechelyulko A.A., Tarakanova Y.N., Dmitriev A.D., Massino Y.S., Segal O.L., Lavrov V.F., Dmitriev D.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ПИ № ФС77-75442 от 01.04.2019 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies